1.
Natalie Parletta. How to respond to difficult or negative peer-reviewer feedback. Nature Index. 2021. https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news-blog/how-to-respond-difficult-negative-peer-reviewer-feedback.
Bias, peer review, and publishing
1.
Committee on Publication Ethics. Bias in peer review. https://publicationethics.org/resources/forum-discussions/bias-peer-review. Published 2021.
1.
Kristijan Armeni, Loek Brinkman, Rickard Carlsson, et al. Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities. Science and Public Policy. 2021;48(5):605-611. doi:10.1093/scipol/scab039
1.
Michael S. Lauer, Jamie Doyle, Joy Wang, Deepshikha Roychowdhury. Associations of topic-specific peer review outcomes and institute and center award rates with funding disparities at the National Institutes of Health. eLife. 2021;10:e67173. doi:10.7554/eLife.67173
1.
Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle, Thiago Dias Sarti. Attitudes toward open peer review among stakeholders of a scholar-led journal in Brazil. Transinformação. 2021;33:e200072. doi:10.1590/2318-0889202133e200072
1.
Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Michael Rera, Edwin H. Wintermute, et al. Empowering grassroots innovation to accelerate biomedical research. PLOS Biology. 2021;19(8):e3001349. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001349
1.
Natalie Parletta. How to respond to difficult or negative peer-reviewer feedback. Nature Index. 2021. https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news/how-to-respond-difficult-negative-peer-reviewer-feedback.
1.
Natalie Shoham, Alexandra Pitman. Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency? BJPsych Advances. 2021;27(4):247-254. doi:10.1192/bja.2020.61
1.
A Hatch, R Schmidt. Rethinking Research Assessment: Unintended Cognitive and System Biases.; 2020. https://sfdora.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/DORA_UnintendendedCognitiveSystemBiases.pdf.
1.
Anna Severin, Joao Martins, Rachel Heyard, François Delavy, Anne Jorstad, Matthias Egger. Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e035058. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035058