Bias, peer review, and publishing

Federico Bianchi, Flaminio Squazzoni. Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review. Science and Public Policy. 2022;49(5):791-800. doi:10.1093/scipol/scac027

Nathalie D. McKenzie, Raymond Liu, Alden V. Chiu, et al. Exploring Bias in Scientific Peer Review: An ASCO Initiative. JCO Oncology Practice. 2022;18(12):791-799. doi:10.1200/OP.22.00275

Carole Lee. Commensuration Bias in Peer Review. Philosophy of Science. 2022;82(5):1272-1283. doi:10.1086/683652

Ramadurai Petchiappan, Kristy James, Andrew Plume, et al. Analysing Elsevier Journal Metadata With a New Specialized Workbench Inside ICSR Lab. Rochester, NY; 2022. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4211833

Committee on Publication Ethics. Bias in peer review. https://publicationethics.org/resources/forum-discussions/bias-peer-review. Published 2021.

Latin American Forum for Research Assessment. Evaluating Scientific Research Assessment. https://www.clacso.org/en/evaluating-scientific-research-assessment/. Published 2021.

Michael S. Lauer, Jamie Doyle, Joy Wang, Deepshikha Roychowdhury. Associations of topic-specific peer review outcomes and institute and center award rates with funding disparities at the National Institutes of Health. eLife. 2021;10:e67173. doi:10.7554/eLife.67173

Balazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi, Alex O. Holcombe. A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2021;6(1):14. doi:10.1186/s41073-021-00118-2

Natalie Parletta. How to respond to difficult or negative peer-reviewer feedback. Nature Index. 2021. https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news-blog/how-to-respond-difficult-negative-peer-reviewer-feedback.

Kristijan Armeni, Loek Brinkman, Rickard Carlsson, et al. Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities. Science and Public Policy. 2021;48(5):605-611. doi:10.1093/scipol/scab039