Bias, peer review, and publishing

Geoff Frampton, Paul Whaley, Micah Bennett, et al. Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews. Environmental Evidence. 2022;11:12. doi:10.1186/s13750-022-00264-0

Nature. Nature is trialling transparent peer review — the early results are encouraging. Nature. 2022;603:8-8. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00493-w

Paul Whaley, Carlijn R. Hooijmans. PRIVAT Tool. 2022. https://osf.io/bwypt/.

Ramadurai Petchiappan, Kristy James, Andrew Plume, et al. Analysing Elsevier Journal Metadata With a New Specialized Workbench Inside ICSR Lab. Rochester, NY; 2022. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4211833

Carole Lee. Commensuration Bias in Peer Review. Philosophy of Science. 2022;82(5):1272-1283. doi:10.1086/683652

Federico Bianchi, Flaminio Squazzoni. Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review. Science and Public Policy. 2022;49(5):791-800. doi:10.1093/scipol/scac027

Nathalie D. McKenzie, Raymond Liu, Alden V. Chiu, et al. Exploring Bias in Scientific Peer Review: An ASCO Initiative. JCO Oncology Practice. 2022;18(12):791-799. doi:10.1200/OP.22.00275

Laura Cruz-Castro, Luis Sanz-Menendez. What should be rewarded? Gender and evaluation criteria for tenure and promotion. Journal of Informetrics. 2021;15(3):101196. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101196

Tamarinde Haven, Joeri Tijdink, Brian Martinson, Lex Bouter, Frans Oort. Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2021;6:7. doi:10.1186/s41073-021-00110-w

Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle, Thiago Dias Sarti. Attitudes toward open peer review among stakeholders of a scholar-led journal in Brazil. Transinformação. 2021;33:e200072. doi:10.1590/2318-0889202133e200072