Bias, peer review, and publishing

1.
Dana Strauss, Sophia Gran-Ruaz, Muna Osman, Monnica T. Williams, Sonya C. Faber. Racism and censorship in the editorial and peer review process. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120938
View Full Reference
1.
Richard Van Noorden. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record. Nature. 2023;624:479-481. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8.
View Full Reference
1.
Abubakari Ahmed, Aceil Al-Khatib, Yap Boum, et al. The future of academic publishing. Nature Human Behaviour. 2023;7:1021-1026. doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01637-2
View Full Reference
1.
Nature. Research evaluation needs to change with the times. Nature. 2022;601(7892):166-166. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00056-z
View Full Reference
1.
James A. Middleton, Stephen Krause, Eugene Judson, et al. A Social Network Analysis of Engineering Faculty Connections: Their Impact on Faculty Student-Centered Attitudes and Practices. Education Sciences. 2022;12(2):108. doi:10.3390/educsci12020108
View Full Reference
1.
Liv Langfeldt. The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome. In: Eva Forsberg, Lars Geschwind, Sara Levander, Wieland Wermke, eds. Peer Review in an Era of Evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham; 2022:297-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75263-7_13.
View Full Reference
1.
Research England, Scottish Funding Council, Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland. Future Research Assessment Programme. https://beta.jisc.ac.uk/future-research-assessment-programme. Published 2022.
View Full Reference
1.
Jerry Suls, Alexander J. Rothman, Karina W. Davidson. Now Is the Time to Assess the Effects of Open Science Practices with Randomized Control Trials. The American psychologist. 2022;77(3):467-475. doi:10.1037/amp0000871
View Full Reference
1.
Geoff Frampton, Paul Whaley, Micah Bennett, et al. Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews. Environmental Evidence. 2022;11:12. doi:10.1186/s13750-022-00264-0
View Full Reference
1.
Holly Else, Jeffrey M. Perkel. The giant plan to track diversity in research journals. Nature. 2022;602:566-570. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00426-7.
View Full Reference