Bias, peer review, and publishing

James A. Middleton, Stephen Krause, Eugene Judson, et al. A Social Network Analysis of Engineering Faculty Connections: Their Impact on Faculty Student-Centered Attitudes and Practices. Education Sciences. 2022;12(2):108. doi:10.3390/educsci12020108

Research England, Scottish Funding Council, Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland. Future Research Assessment Programme. https://beta.jisc.ac.uk/future-research-assessment-programme. Published 2022.

Stephen Curry, Sarah de Rijcke, Anna Hatch, Dorsamy (Gansen) Pillay, Inge van der Weijden, James Wilsdon. The Changing Role of Funders in Responsible Research Assessment: Progress, Obstacles and the Way Ahead (RoRI Working Paper No.3). Sheffield: Research on Research Institute; 2022:64. https://rori.figshare.com/articles/report/The_changing_role_of_funders_in_responsible_research_assessment_progress_obstacles_and_the_way_ahead/13227914/2.

Holly Else, Jeffrey M. Perkel. The giant plan to track diversity in research journals. Nature. 2022;602:566-570. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00426-7.

Geoff Frampton, Paul Whaley, Micah Bennett, et al. Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews. Environmental Evidence. 2022;11:12. doi:10.1186/s13750-022-00264-0

Nature. Nature is trialling transparent peer review — the early results are encouraging. Nature. 2022;603:8-8. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00493-w

Paul Whaley, Carlijn R. Hooijmans. PRIVAT Tool. 2022. https://osf.io/bwypt/.

Nathalie D. McKenzie, Raymond Liu, Alden V. Chiu, et al. Exploring Bias in Scientific Peer Review: An ASCO Initiative. JCO Oncology Practice. 2022;18(12):791-799. doi:10.1200/OP.22.00275

Ramadurai Petchiappan, Kristy James, Andrew Plume, et al. Analysing Elsevier Journal Metadata With a New Specialized Workbench Inside ICSR Lab. Rochester, NY; 2022. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4211833

Federico Bianchi, Flaminio Squazzoni. Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review. Science and Public Policy. 2022;49(5):791-800. doi:10.1093/scipol/scac027