Richard Van Noorden. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record. Nature. 2023;624:479-481. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8.
Aileen Oeberst, Roland Imhoff. Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2023;18(6):17456916221148147. doi:10.1177/17456916221148147
Jessie V. Willis, Kelly D. Cobey, Janina Ramos, et al. Limited online training opportunities exist for scholarly peer reviewers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2023;161:65-73. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.023
Cory J. Clark, Lee Jussim, Komi Frey, et al. Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023;120(48):e2301642120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2301642120
Dana Strauss, Sophia Gran-Ruaz, Muna Osman, Monnica T. Williams, Sonya C. Faber. Racism and censorship in the editorial and peer review process. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120938
Camilla Svendsen, Paul Whaley, Gunn E. Vist, et al. Protocol for designing INVITES-IN, a tool for assessing the internal validity of in vitro studies. Evidence-Based Toxicology. 2023;1(1):2232415. doi:10.1080/2833373X.2023.2232415
Liv Langfeldt, Ingvild Reymert, Silje Marie Svartefoss. Distrust in grant peer review—reasons and remedies. Science and Public Policy. 2023;51(1):28-41. doi:10.1093/scipol/scad051
Manuel Ansede. Public funds being swallowed up by scientific journals with dubious articles. https://english.elpais.com/science-tech/2023-10-31/public-funds-being-swallowed-up-by-scientific-journals-with-dubious-articles.html. Published 2023.
Abubakari Ahmed, Aceil Al-Khatib, Yap Boum, et al. The future of academic publishing. Nature Human Behaviour. 2023;7:1021-1026. doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01637-2