Bias, peer review, and publishing

1.
Stefanie Schneider, Cat Morgan, Clayton Magill, Marion Hersh, Katherine Sang, Robert MacIntosh. Evidence Review: Peer Review Bias in the Funding Process: Main Themes and Interventions. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University; 2024. doi:10.17861/YDDH-B137
View Full Reference
1.
Giovanni Colavizza, Lauren Cadwallader, Marcel LaFlamme, et al. An Analysis of the Effects of Sharing Research Data, Code, and Preprints on Citations.; 2024. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.16171
View Full Reference
1.
Mike Lauer, Marie A. Bernard. Trends Generally Continue in FY 2023 for Demographic-Specific Funding Rates for Type 1 Research Project Grant and R01-Equivalent Applications –. https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2024/07/29/trends-generally-continue-in-fy-2023-for-demographic-specific-funding-rates-for-type-1-research-project-grant-and-r01-equivalent-applications/. Published 2024.
View Full Reference
1.
Review of peer review: June 2023. https://www.ukri.org/publications/review-of-peer-review/review-of-peer-review-june-2023/. Published 2023.
View Full Reference
1.
Richard Van Noorden. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record. Nature. 2023;624:479-481. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8.
View Full Reference
1.
Gro H. Mathisen, Gunn E. Vist, Paul Whaley, et al. Protocol: Testing the Performance of INVITES-IN, A Tool for Assessing the Internal Validity of In Vitro Studies. Evidence-Based Toxicology. 2023;1(1):2293289. doi:10.1080/2833373X.2023.2293289
View Full Reference
1.
Rebecca Abma-Schouten, Joey Gijbels, Wendy Reijmerink, Ingeborg Meijer. Evaluation of research proposals by peer review panels: broader panels for broader assessments? Science and Public Policy. 2023;50(4):619-632. doi:10.1093/scipol/scad009
View Full Reference
1.
Eva Barlösius, Laura Paruschke, Axel Philipps. Peer review’s irremediable flaws: Scientists’ perspectives on grant evaluation in Germany. Research Evaluation. 2023;32(4):623-634. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvad032
View Full Reference
1.
Stephen A. Gallo, Michael Pearce, Carole J. Lee, Elena A. Erosheva. A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;8:10. doi:10.1186/s41073-023-00131-7
View Full Reference
1.
Karen B. Schmaling, Stephen A. Gallo. Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;8:2. doi:10.1186/s41073-023-00127-3
View Full Reference