Bias, peer review, and publishing

1.
Karen B. Schmaling, Stephen A. Gallo. Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;8:2. doi:10.1186/s41073-023-00127-3
View Full Reference
1.
Rebecca Abma-Schouten, Joey Gijbels, Wendy Reijmerink, Ingeborg Meijer. Evaluation of research proposals by peer review panels: broader panels for broader assessments? Science and Public Policy. 2023;50(4):619-632. doi:10.1093/scipol/scad009
View Full Reference
1.
Eva Barlösius, Laura Paruschke, Axel Philipps. Peer review’s irremediable flaws: Scientists’ perspectives on grant evaluation in Germany. Research Evaluation. 2023;32(4):623-634. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvad032
View Full Reference
1.
Gro H. Mathisen, Gunn E. Vist, Paul Whaley, et al. Protocol: Testing the Performance of INVITES-IN, A Tool for Assessing the Internal Validity of In Vitro Studies. Evidence-Based Toxicology. 2023;1(1):2293289. doi:10.1080/2833373X.2023.2293289
View Full Reference
1.
Sara Khan, Faraz Eshaghi, Aruba Sohail, et al. A 10 Year Analysis of Gender Distribution in National Institutes of Health Funding for Non-Malignant Hematology. Blood. 2023;142(S1):5113. doi:10.1182/blood-2023-180317
View Full Reference
1.
Mytien Nguyen, Sarwat I. Chaudhry, Mayur M. Desai, Kafui Dzirasa, Jose E. Cavazos, Dowin Boatright. Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Inequities in Receipt of Multiple National Institutes of Health Research Project Grants. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6(2):e230855. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0855
View Full Reference
1.
Cory J. Clark, Lee Jussim, Komi Frey, et al. Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023;120(48):e2301642120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2301642120
View Full Reference
1.
Review of peer review: June 2023. https://www.ukri.org/publications/review-of-peer-review/review-of-peer-review-june-2023/. Published 2023.
View Full Reference
1.
Richard Van Noorden. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record. Nature. 2023;624:479-481. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8.
View Full Reference
1.
Manuel Ansede. Public funds being swallowed up by scientific journals with dubious articles. https://english.elpais.com/science-tech/2023-10-31/public-funds-being-swallowed-up-by-scientific-journals-with-dubious-articles.html. Published 2023.
View Full Reference