Bias, peer review, and publishing

1.
Liv Langfeldt, Ingvild Reymert, Silje Marie Svartefoss. Distrust in grant peer review—reasons and remedies. Science and Public Policy. 2023;51(1):28-41. doi:10.1093/scipol/scad051
View Full Reference
1.
Aileen Oeberst, Roland Imhoff. Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2023;18(6):17456916221148147. doi:10.1177/17456916221148147
View Full Reference
1.
Dana Strauss, Sophia Gran-Ruaz, Muna Osman, Monnica T. Williams, Sonya C. Faber. Racism and censorship in the editorial and peer review process. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120938
View Full Reference
1.
Abubakari Ahmed, Aceil Al-Khatib, Yap Boum, et al. The future of academic publishing. Nature Human Behaviour. 2023;7:1021-1026. doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01637-2
View Full Reference
1.
Mytien Nguyen, Sarwat I. Chaudhry, Mayur M. Desai, Kafui Dzirasa, Jose E. Cavazos, Dowin Boatright. Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Inequities in Receipt of Multiple National Institutes of Health Research Project Grants. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6(2):e230855. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0855
View Full Reference
1.
Manuel Ansede. Public funds being swallowed up by scientific journals with dubious articles. https://english.elpais.com/science-tech/2023-10-31/public-funds-being-swallowed-up-by-scientific-journals-with-dubious-articles.html. Published 2023.
View Full Reference
1.
Richard Van Noorden. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record. Nature. 2023;624:479-481. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8.
View Full Reference
1.
Nature. Research evaluation needs to change with the times. Nature. 2022;601(7892):166-166. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00056-z
View Full Reference
1.
Liv Langfeldt. The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome. In: Eva Forsberg, Lars Geschwind, Sara Levander, Wieland Wermke, eds. Peer Review in an Era of Evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham; 2022:297-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75263-7_13.
View Full Reference
1.
Jerry Suls, Alexander J. Rothman, Karina W. Davidson. Now Is the Time to Assess the Effects of Open Science Practices with Randomized Control Trials. The American psychologist. 2022;77(3):467-475. doi:10.1037/amp0000871
View Full Reference