Bias, peer review, and publishing

1.
Declaration on Research Assessment. Signers. https://sfdora.org/signers/. Published 2024.
View Full Reference
1.
Aurore Receveur, Jonathan Bonfanti, Stephanie D’Agata, et al. David versus Goliath: Early career researchers in an unethical publishing system. Ecology Letters. 2024;27(3):e14395. doi:10.1111/ele.14395
View Full Reference
1.
David Johann, Jörg Neufeld, Kathrin Thomas, Justus Rathmann, Heiko Rauhut. The impact of researchers’ perceived pressure on their publication strategies. Research Evaluation. 2024:rvae011. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvae011
View Full Reference
1.
Tony Ross-Hellauer, Serge P J M Horbach. Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review. Research Evaluation. 2024:rvae004. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvae004
View Full Reference
1.
Mark J. Bolland, Alison Avenell, Andrew Grey. Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better? Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 2024:1-20. doi:10.1080/03036758.2024.2325004
View Full Reference
1.
Olivia M. Smith, Kayla L. Davis, Robin Waterman, et al. Journals must expand access to peer review data. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2024;39(4):311-314. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2024.02.003
View Full Reference
1.
Nicki Lisa Cole, Eva Kormann, Thomas Klebel, Simon Apartis, Tony Ross-Hellauer. The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 2024;11(6):240286. doi:10.1098/rsos.240286
View Full Reference
1.
Mike Lauer, Marie A. Bernard. Trends Generally Continue in FY 2023 for Demographic-Specific Funding Rates for Type 1 Research Project Grant and R01-Equivalent Applications –. https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2024/07/29/trends-generally-continue-in-fy-2023-for-demographic-specific-funding-rates-for-type-1-research-project-grant-and-r01-equivalent-applications/. Published 2024.
View Full Reference
1.
Giovanni Colavizza, Lauren Cadwallader, Marcel LaFlamme, et al. An Analysis of the Effects of Sharing Research Data, Code, and Preprints on Citations.; 2024. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.16171
View Full Reference
1.
Stefanie Schneider, Cat Morgan, Clayton Magill, Marion Hersh, Katherine Sang, Robert MacIntosh. Evidence Review: Peer Review Bias in the Funding Process: Main Themes and Interventions. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University; 2024. doi:10.17861/YDDH-B137
View Full Reference