Bias, peer review, and publishing

Judith C. Madden, Helena Kandarova, Winfried Neuhaus, et al. Journeying Through Journals: The Publishing Process and How to Maximise Research Impact. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 2024;52(6):334-351. doi:10.1177/02611929241286624

Mike Lauer, Marie A. Bernard. Trends Generally Continue in FY 2023 for Demographic-Specific Funding Rates for Type 1 Research Project Grant and R01-Equivalent Applications –. https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2024/07/29/trends-generally-continue-in-fy-2023-for-demographic-specific-funding-rates-for-type-1-research-project-grant-and-r01-equivalent-applications/. Published 2024.

Giovanni Colavizza, Lauren Cadwallader, Marcel LaFlamme, et al. An Analysis of the Effects of Sharing Research Data, Code, and Preprints on Citations.; 2024. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.16171

Stefanie Schneider, Cat Morgan, Clayton Magill, Marion Hersh, Katherine Sang, Robert MacIntosh. Evidence Review: Peer Review Bias in the Funding Process: Main Themes and Interventions. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University; 2024. doi:10.17861/YDDH-B137

Nicki Lisa Cole, Eva Kormann, Thomas Klebel, Simon Apartis, Tony Ross-Hellauer. The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 2024;11(6):240286. doi:10.1098/rsos.240286

Paul Whaley, Robyn B Blain, Derek Draper, et al. Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank. Toxicological Sciences. 2024;201(2):240-253. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfae083

Marta Moreno-Ibáñez, Mathieu Casado, Gwenaëlle Gremion, et al. Engagement of early career researchers in collaborative assessments of IPCC reports: achievements and insights. Frontiers in Climate. 2024;6. doi:10.3389/fclim.2024.1395040

Xi Cheng, Haoran Wang, Li Tang, Weiyan Jiang, Maotian Zhou, Guoyan Wang. Open peer review correlates with altmetrics but not with citations: Evidence from <i>Nature Communications</i> and <i>PLoS One</i> Journal of Informetrics. 2024;18(3):101540. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2024.101540

Cory J. Clark, Lee Jussim, Komi Frey, et al. Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023;120(48):e2301642120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2301642120

Mytien Nguyen, Sarwat I. Chaudhry, Mayur M. Desai, Kafui Dzirasa, Jose E. Cavazos, Dowin Boatright. Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Inequities in Receipt of Multiple National Institutes of Health Research Project Grants. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6(2):e230855. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0855