Bias, peer review, and publishing

Mike Lauer, Marie A. Bernard. Trends Generally Continue in FY 2023 for Demographic-Specific Funding Rates for Type 1 Research Project Grant and R01-Equivalent Applications –. https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2024/07/29/trends-generally-continue-in-fy-2023-for-demographic-specific-funding-rates-for-type-1-research-project-grant-and-r01-equivalent-applications/. Published 2024.

Nicki Lisa Cole, Eva Kormann, Thomas Klebel, Simon Apartis, Tony Ross-Hellauer. The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 2024;11(6):240286. doi:10.1098/rsos.240286

Paul Whaley, Robyn B Blain, Derek Draper, et al. Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank. Toxicological Sciences. 2024;201(2):240-253. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfae083

Stefanie Schneider, Cat Morgan, Clayton Magill, Marion Hersh, Katherine Sang, Robert MacIntosh. Evidence Review: Peer Review Bias in the Funding Process: Main Themes and Interventions. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University; 2024. https://doi.org/10.17861/YDDH-B137.

Liv Langfeldt, Ingvild Reymert, Silje Marie Svartefoss. Distrust in grant peer review—reasons and remedies. Science and Public Policy. 2023;51(1):28-41. doi:10.1093/scipol/scad051

Dana Strauss, Sophia Gran-Ruaz, Muna Osman, Monnica T. Williams, Sonya C. Faber. Racism and censorship in the editorial and peer review process. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120938

Aileen Oeberst, Roland Imhoff. Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2023;18(6):17456916221148147. doi:10.1177/17456916221148147

Cory J. Clark, Lee Jussim, Komi Frey, et al. Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023;120(48):e2301642120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2301642120

Sara Khan, Faraz Eshaghi, Aruba Sohail, et al. A 10 Year Analysis of Gender Distribution in National Institutes of Health Funding for Non-Malignant Hematology. Blood. 2023;142(S1):5113. doi:10.1182/blood-2023-180317

Rebecca Abma-Schouten, Joey Gijbels, Wendy Reijmerink, Ingeborg Meijer. Evaluation of research proposals by peer review panels: broader panels for broader assessments? Science and Public Policy. 2023;50(4):619-632. doi:10.1093/scipol/scad009