1.
Alison Mudditt. Reforming Research Assessment: A Tough Nut to Crack. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/02/18/reforming-research-assessment-a-tough-nut-to-crack/. Published 2020.
Bias, peer review, and publishing
1.
Anna Severin, Joao Martins, Rachel Heyard, François Delavy, Anne Jorstad, Matthias Egger. Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e035058. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035058
1.
Simon Lohse, Martin S. Wasmer, Thomas A. C. Reydon. Integrating Philosophy of Science into Research on Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in the Life Sciences. Perspectives on Science. 2020;28(6):700-736. doi:10.1162/posc_a_00357
1.
Flaminio Squazzoni, Petra Ahrweiler, Tiago Barros, et al. Unlock ways to share data on peer review. Nature. 2020;578:512-514. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-00500-y
1.
Travis A. Hoppe, Aviva Litovitz, Kristine A. Willis, et al. Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. Science Advances. 2019;5(10):aww7238. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw7238
1.
Nicholas J. DeVito, Ben Goldacre. Publication bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/. Published 2019.
1.
Gemma Conroy. Q&A Linda Beaumont: Journals should take action against toxic peer reviews. Nature Index. 2019. https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news-blog/linda-beaumont-research-journals-should-take-action-against-toxic-peer-reviews.
1.
Erin C McKiernan, Lesley A Schimanski, Carol Muñoz Nieves, Lisa Matthias, Meredith T Niles, Juan P Alperin. Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. Emma Pewsey, Peter Rodgers, Björn Brembs, eds. eLife. 2019;8:e47338. doi:10.7554/eLife.47338
1.
Nicholas J. DeVito, Ben Goldacre. Catalogue of bias: publication bias. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2019;24:53-54. doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111107
1.
Nyssa J. Silbiger, Amber D. Stubler. Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM. PeerJ. 2019;7:e8247. doi:10.7717/peerj.8247