Bias, peer review, and publishing

Kristijan Armeni, Loek Brinkman, Rickard Carlsson, et al. Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities. Science and Public Policy. 2021;48(5):605-611. doi:10.1093/scipol/scab039

Committee on Publication Ethics. Bias in peer review. https://publicationethics.org/resources/forum-discussions/bias-peer-review. Published 2021.

Natalie Parletta. How to respond to difficult or negative peer-reviewer feedback. Nature Index. 2021. https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news/how-to-respond-difficult-negative-peer-reviewer-feedback.

Stijn Conix, Andreas De Block, Krist Vaesen. Grant Writing and Grant Peer Review As Questionable Research Practices.; 2021. doi:10.12688/f1000research.73893.2

Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Michael Rera, Edwin H. Wintermute, et al. Empowering grassroots innovation to accelerate biomedical research. PLOS Biology. 2021;19(8):e3001349. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001349

Flaminio Squazzoni, Petra Ahrweiler, Tiago Barros, et al. Unlock ways to share data on peer review. Nature. 2020;578:512-514. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-00500-y

Anna Severin, Joao Martins, Rachel Heyard, François Delavy, Anne Jorstad, Matthias Egger. Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e035058. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035058

Helen Le Sueur, Arianna Dagliati, Iain Buchan, et al. Pride and prejudice – What can we learn from peer review? Medical Teacher. 2020;42(9):1012-1018. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1774527

Danielle B. Rice, Hana Raffoul, John P. A. Ioannidis, David Moher. Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities. BMJ. 2020;369:m2081. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2081

Alison Mudditt. Reforming Research Assessment: A Tough Nut to Crack. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/02/18/reforming-research-assessment-a-tough-nut-to-crack/. Published 2020.