Bias, peer review, and publishing

NIH Center for Scientific Review. Reviewer Surveys — Feedback on CSRs’ Bias Awareness and Mitigation Training. https://public.csr.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2022-04/Reviewer_Bias_Training_Survey_Report_2022-01_Council_Round_final.pdf.

David Moher, Lex Bouter, Sabine Kleinert, et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology. 18(7):e3000737. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737

Anne Gärtner, Daniel Leising, Felix D. Schönbrodt. Towards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality. PLOS Biology. 22(2):e3002553. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002553

Ivan Stelmakh, Charvi Rastogi, Ryan Liu, Shuchi Chawla, Federico Echenique, Nihar B. Shah. Cite-seeing and reviewing: A study on citation bias in peer review. PLOS ONE. 18(7):e0283980. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283980

Kelly D. Cobey, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Matthew J. Page, et al. Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research. PLOS Biology. 22(11):e3002870. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002870

Hendy Abdoul, Christophe Perrey, Florence Tubach, Philippe Amiel, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Corinne Alberti. Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest in Academic Grant Evaluation: A Qualitative Study of Multiple Stakeholders in France. PLOS ONE. 7(4):e35247. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035247

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. Minimizing Unconscious Bias in Peer Revew. https://www.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/Minimizing-Unconscous-Bias.pdf.

Tania Henriquez. Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher. mBio. 14(5):e01948-23. doi:10.1128/mbio.01948-23

What Is a Good Impact Factor for an Academic Journal?. https://akjournals.com/page/222.

Olivia Olivares. LibGuides: Impact factors: What they are, where to find them, how to use them: Introduction to impact factors. https://libguides.ucmerced.edu/c.php?g=1277431&p=9373712.