Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Author Guide
    • Experimental Resources
    • Preregistration
    • Manuscript Preparation
    • Journal Database
    • Suggesting Reviewers
    • Responding to Biased Reviews
    • Reference Library
  • Projects
    • Gathering Evidence
    • Editor Outreach
    • Funder Advocacy
    • What Researchers Can Do
  • Resources
    • Publications & Media
    • Webinar Recordings
    • Experimental Resources
    • Reference Library
  • Events
  • About

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?

Simon Wessely
The Lancet. 1998;352(9124):301-305. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11129-1
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(97)11129-1/abstract
Keywords
Academies and Institutes
Costs and Cost Analysis
Humans
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Peer Review, Research
Research Support as Topic
United Kingdom
United States
Library Collection(s)
Bias, peer review, and publishing
BibTeX EndNote X3 XML EndNote 7 XML EndNote tagged Marc RIS
RSS feed

Footer

  • Contact
  • Sign Up
  • Privacy Policy
STAY CONNECTED

The content of this website is adapted from Krebs et al., Author Guide for Addressing Animal Methods Bias in Publishing. Advanced Science. 2023 Aug 30:e2303226. doi: 10.1002/advs.202303226. © 2023 by Krebs et al. is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Advanced Science, published by Wiley-VCH GmbH. Wiley-VCH GmbH does not endorse the COLAAB, nor our use of the content. 

This website is managed by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.