Bias, peer review, and publishing

Liv Langfeldt, Lina Ingeborgrud, Ingvild Reymert, Silje Marie Svartefoss, Siri Brorstad Borlaug. Evaluation of the Spark Pilot: Identifying Novel and Unconventional Research by Doubleblinded Peer Review. Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2995910.

ASAPbio. Peer review survey results. https://asapbio.org/peer-review/survey.

Michael W. Brunt, Daniel M. Weary. Public consultation in the evaluation of animal research protocols. PLOS ONE. 16(12):e0260114. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260114

Kelly D. Cobey, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Matthew J. Page, et al. Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research. PLOS Biology. 22(11):e3002870. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002870

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. Minimizing Unconscious Bias in Peer Revew. https://www.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/Minimizing-Unconscous-Bias.pdf.

Tania Henriquez. Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher. mBio. 14(5):e01948-23. doi:10.1128/mbio.01948-23