Bias, peer review, and publishing

Tony Ross-Hellauer, Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt. Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers. PLOS ONE. 12(12):e0189311. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189311

Till Bruckner, Susanne Wieschowski, Miriam Heider, et al. Measurement challenges and causes of incomplete results reporting of biomedical animal studies: Results from an interview study. PLOS ONE. 17(8):e0271976. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271976

Kerry Dwan, Carrol Gamble, Paula R. Williamson, Jamie J. Kirkham. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review. PLOS ONE. 8(7):e66844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066844

David Moher, Lex Bouter, Sabine Kleinert, et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology. 18(7):e3000737. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737

John P. A. Ioannidis. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLOS Medicine. 2(8):e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Anne Gärtner, Daniel Leising, Felix D. Schönbrodt. Towards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality. PLOS Biology. 22(2):e3002553. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002553

Jay Bhattacharya, Mikko Packalen. Encouraging Edge Science through NIH Funding Practices. Stanford: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research; :4. https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/policy-brief/encouraging-edge-science-through-nih-funding-practices.

Malcolm R. Macleod, Aaron Lawson McLean, Aikaterini Kyriakopoulou, et al. Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement. PLOS Biology. 13(10):e1002273. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273

NIH Center for Scientific Review. Reviewer Surveys — Feedback on CSRs’ Bias Awareness and Mitigation Training. https://public.csr.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2022-04/Reviewer_Bias_Training_Survey_Report_2022-01_Council_Round_final.pdf.

Ivan Stelmakh, Charvi Rastogi, Ryan Liu, Shuchi Chawla, Federico Echenique, Nihar B. Shah. Cite-seeing and reviewing: A study on citation bias in peer review. PLOS ONE. 18(7):e0283980. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283980