Search
Doing institutional analysis: implications for the study of innovations
ReferenceJ. Rogers Hollingsworth Review of International Political Economy. 2011;7(4):595-644. doi: 10.1080/096922900750034563 The study of institutions and innovativeness is presently high on the agenda of the social sciences. There is increasing concern with how …
The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: the result is more animal-based research
ReferenceMark J. Rice Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. 2011;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-6-12 Biomedical research today can be generally classified as human-based or nonhuman animal-based, each with separate and distinct review boards that must …
Empowering grassroots innovation to accelerate biomedical research
ReferenceBastian Greshake Tzovaras , Michael Rera , Edwin H. Wintermute , Katharina Kloppenborg , Juliette Ferry-Danini , Guy Aidelberg , Rachel Aronoff , Ariel Lindner , Dusan Misevic PLOS Biology. 2021;19(8):e3001349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001349 The …
Integrating Philosophy of Science into Research on Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in the Life Sciences
ReferenceSimon Lohse , Martin S. Wasmer , Thomas A. C. Reydon Perspectives on Science. 2020;28(6):700-736. doi: 10.1162/posc_a_00357 This paper argues that research on normative issues in the life sciences will benefit from a tighter integration of philosophy of …
What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?
ReferenceSusan Guthrie , Ioana Ghiga , Steven Wooding F1000Research. 2018;6:1335. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11917.2 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11917.2 Keywords funding allocation grant awarding grant reviewing peer review Library Collection(s) Bias, …
Risk evaluation in peer review of grant applications
ReferenceStephen Gallo , Lisa Thompson , Karen Schmaling , Scott Glisson Environment Systems and Decisions. 2018;38:216-229. doi: 10.1007/s10669-018-9677-6 The process of peer review is used to identify the most scientifically meritorious research projects for …
A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank
ReferenceStephen A. Gallo , Michael Pearce , Carole J. Lee , Elena A. Erosheva Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;8:10. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00131-7 In many grant review settings, proposals are selected for funding on the basis of summary statistics of …
Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
ReferenceKaren B. Schmaling , Stephen A. Gallo Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;8:2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00127-3 Differential participation and success in grant applications may contribute to women’s lesser representation in the sciences. This study’s …
Evaluation of research proposals by peer review panels: broader panels for broader assessments?
ReferenceRebecca Abma-Schouten , Joey Gijbels , Wendy Reijmerink , Ingeborg Meijer Science and Public Policy. 2023;50(4):619-632. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scad009 Panel peer review is widely used to decide which research proposals receive funding. Through this …
Peer review’s irremediable flaws: Scientists’ perspectives on grant evaluation in Germany
ReferenceEva Barlösius , Laura Paruschke , Axel Philipps Research Evaluation. 2023;32(4):623-634. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvad032 Peer review has developed over time to become the established procedure for assessing and assuring the scientific quality of research. …