Publishing

Flaminio Squazzoni, Petra Ahrweiler, Tiago Barros, et al. Unlock ways to share data on peer review. Nature. 2020;578:512-514. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-00500-y

Samir Haffar, Fateh Bazerbachi, M. Hassan Murad. Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2019;94(4):670-676. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.004

Devang Mehta. Highlight negative results to improve science. Nature. 2019. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02960-3.

Giangiacomo Bravo, Francisco Grimaldo, Emilia López-Iñesta, Bahar Mehmani, Flaminio Squazzoni. The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):322. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08250-2

Thomas Hartung, Rob De Vries, Sebastian Hoffmann, et al. Toward Good In Vitro Reporting Standards. Alternatives to Animal Experimentation. 2019;36(1):3-17. doi:10.14573/altex.1812191

Monya Baker. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016;533:452-454. https://www.nature.com/articles/533452a.

Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke, Ismael Rafols. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. 2015;520(7548):429-431. doi:10.1038/520429a

James Galipeau, David Moher, Craig Campbell, et al. A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2015;68(3):257-265. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.024

Adrian Mulligan, Louise Hall, Ellen Raphael. Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013;64(1):132-161. doi:10.1002/asi.22798

Donna K. Ginther, Walter T. Schaffer, Joshua Schnell, et al. Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science. 2011;333(6045):1015-1019. doi:10.1126/science.1196783