1.
Katarina Zimmer. ‘Lipstick on a pig’: how to fight back against a peer-review bully. Nature. 2025;645(8081):809-812. doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02922-y
peer review
1.
Transparent peer review to be extended to all of Nature’s research papers. Nature. 2025;642(8068):542-542. doi:10.1038/d41586-025-01880-9
1.
Christine Ro. How ‘animal methods bias’ is affecting research careers. Nature. 2025. doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00593-3
1.
Catharine E. Krebs, Kathrin Herrmann. Confronting the bias towards animal experimentation (animal methods bias). Frontiers in Drug Discovery. 2024;4. doi:10.3389/fddsv.2024.1347798
1.
Marta Moreno-Ibáñez, Mathieu Casado, Gwenaëlle Gremion, et al. Engagement of early career researchers in collaborative assessments of IPCC reports: achievements and insights. Frontiers in Climate. 2024;6. doi:10.3389/fclim.2024.1395040
1.
Stefanie Schneider, Cat Morgan, Clayton Magill, Marion Hersh, Katherine Sang, Robert MacIntosh. Evidence Review: Peer Review Bias in the Funding Process: Main Themes and Interventions. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University; 2024. https://doi.org/10.17861/YDDH-B137.
1.
Olivia M. Smith, Kayla L. Davis, Robin Waterman, et al. Journals must expand access to peer review data. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2024;39(4):311-314. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2024.02.003
1.
Karen B. Schmaling, Stephen A. Gallo. Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;8:2. doi:10.1186/s41073-023-00127-3
1.
Stephen A. Gallo, Michael Pearce, Carole J. Lee, Elena A. Erosheva. A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;8:10. doi:10.1186/s41073-023-00131-7
1.
Catharine E. Krebs, Celean Camp, Helder Constantino, et al. Author Guide for Addressing Animal Methods Bias in Publishing. Advanced Science. 2023;10(30):2303226. doi:10.1002/advs.202303226