1.
Christine Ro. How ‘animal methods bias’ is affecting research careers. Nature. 2025. doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00593-3
Funding
1.
Francesca Pistollato, Fabia Furtmann, Annalisa Gastaldello, et al. Bridging the prevention gap: funding distribution and methodological shifts in prevention-focused biomedical research under EU framework programmes. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2025;23(1):1006. doi:10.1186/s12967-025-07019-8
1.
Finn Luebber, Sören Krach, Frieder M. Paulus, Lena Rademacher, Rima-Maria Rahal. Lottery before peer review is associated with increased female representation and reduced estimated economic cost in a German funding line. Nature Communications. 2025;16(1):9824. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65660-9
1.
Stefanie Schneider, Cat Morgan, Clayton Magill, Marion Hersh, Katherine Sang, Robert MacIntosh. Evidence Review: Peer Review Bias in the Funding Process: Main Themes and Interventions. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University; 2024. https://doi.org/10.17861/YDDH-B137.
1.
Aurore Receveur, Jonathan Bonfanti, Stephanie D’Agata, et al. David versus Goliath: Early career researchers in an unethical publishing system. Ecology Letters. 2024;27(3):e14395. doi:10.1111/ele.14395
1.
Francesca Pistollato, Gregor Burkhart, Pierre Deceuninck, et al. What public health challenges and unmet medical needs would benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration in the EU? A survey and multi-stakeholder debate. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024;12:1417684. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1417684
1.
Michael S. Lauer, Jamie Doyle, Joy Wang, Deepshikha Roychowdhury. Associations of topic-specific peer review outcomes and institute and center award rates with funding disparities at the National Institutes of Health. eLife. 2021;10:e67173. doi:10.7554/eLife.67173
1.
Francesca Pistollato, Camilla Bernasconi, Janine McCarthy, et al. Alzheimer’s Disease, and Breast and Prostate Cancer Research: Translational Failures and the Importance to Monitor Outputs and Impact of Funded Research. Animals (Basel). 2020;10(7):1194. doi:10.3390/ani10071194
1.
Herbert W. Marsh, Upali W. Jayasinghe, Nigel W. Bond. Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. American Psychologist. 2008;63(3):160-168. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.160