peer review

Kerry Dwan, Carrol Gamble, Paula R. Williamson, Jamie J. Kirkham. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review. PLOS ONE. 8(7):e66844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066844

Kelly D. Cobey, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Matthew J. Page, et al. Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research. PLOS Biology. 22(11):e3002870. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002870

Peter Kolarz. The time has come for big changes to improve research funding. PLOS Biology. 24(4):e3003754. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003754

Carl T. Bergstrom, Kevin Gross. Screening, sorting, and the feedback cycles that imperil peer review. PLOS Biology. 24(2):e3003650. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003650

David Moher, Lex Bouter, Sabine Kleinert, et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology. 18(7):e3000737. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737

Hendy Abdoul, Christophe Perrey, Florence Tubach, Philippe Amiel, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Corinne Alberti. Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest in Academic Grant Evaluation: A Qualitative Study of Multiple Stakeholders in France. PLOS ONE. 7(4):e35247. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035247

Ivan Stelmakh, Charvi Rastogi, Ryan Liu, Shuchi Chawla, Federico Echenique, Nihar B. Shah. Cite-seeing and reviewing: A study on citation bias in peer review. PLOS ONE. 18(7):e0283980. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0283980