peer review

Ferric C Fang, Anthony Bowen, Arturo Casadevall. NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity. eLife. 2016;5:e13323. doi:10.7554/eLife.13323

James Galipeau, David Moher, Craig Campbell, et al. A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2015;68(3):257-265. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.024

Hidde Ploegh. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments. Nature. 2011;472(7344):391-391. doi:10.1038/472391a

Liv Langfeldt, Svein Kyvik. Researchers as evaluators: tasks, tensions and politics. Higher Education. 2011;62:199-212. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9382-y

S. N. Goodman, J. Berlin, S. W. Fletcher, R. H. Fletcher. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994;121(1):11-21. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-121-1-199407010-00003

Hendy Abdoul, Christophe Perrey, Philippe Amiel, et al. Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices. PLOS ONE. 7(9):e46054. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046054

Harriet A. Carroll, Zoi Toumpakari, Laura Johnson, James A. Betts. The perceived feasibility of methods to reduce publication bias. PLOS ONE. 12(10):e0186472. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186472

Cecilia A. Sánchez, Collin J. Schwantes, Shannon Ball, et al. Gendered male and high-income country authors dominate publication at a One Health research organization. PLOS ONE. 21(6):e0352401. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0352401

Michele Avissar-Whiting, Frédérique Belliard, Stefano M. Bertozzi, et al. Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science. PLOS Biology. 22(2):e3002502. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002502

Tony Ross-Hellauer, Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt. Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers. PLOS ONE. 12(12):e0189311. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189311