3Rs

1.
Kathrin Herrmann, Francesca Pistollato, Martin L. Stephens. Beyond the 3Rs: Expanding the use of human-relevant replacement methods in biomedical research. Alternatives to Animal Experimentation. 2019;36(3):343-352. doi:10.14573/altex.1907031
View Full Reference
1.
S. Bressers, H. van den Elzen, C. Gräwe, D. van den Oetelaar, P. H. A. Postma, S. K. Schoustra. Policy driven changes in animal research practices: mapping researchers’ attitudes towards animal-free innovations using the Netherlands as an example. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2019;4(1):8. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0067-5
View Full Reference
1.
Jon Hamm, Kristie Sullivan, Amy J. Clippinger, et al. Alternative approaches for identifying acute systemic toxicity: Moving from research to regulatory testing. Toxicology in Vitro. 2017;41:245-259. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2017.01.004
View Full Reference
1.
A. C. Gray, S. S. Sidhu, P. C. Chandrasekera, C. F. M. Hendriksen, C. a. K. Borrebaeck. Animal-Friendly Affinity Reagents: Replacing the Needless in the Haystack. Trends in Biotechnology. 2016;34(12):960-969. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.017
View Full Reference
1.
Malin Masterton, Tobias Renberg, Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong. Patients’ attitudes towards animal testing: “To conduct research on animals is, I suppose, a necessary evil.” BioSocieties. 2014;9(1):24-41. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2013.39
View Full Reference