1.
Joel Henrique Ellwanger, José Artur Bogo Chies. We need to talk about peer-review—Experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2020;125:201-205. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.02.001
Bias, peer review, and publishing
1.
Helen Le Sueur, Arianna Dagliati, Iain Buchan, et al. Pride and prejudice – What can we learn from peer review? Medical Teacher. 2020;42(9):1012-1018. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1774527
1.
Dietmar Wolfram, Peiling Wang, Adam Hembree, Hyoungjoo Park. Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science. Scientometrics. 2020;125(2):1033-1051. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03488-4
1.
Nicholas J. DeVito, Ben Goldacre. Catalogue of bias: publication bias. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2019;24:53-54. doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111107
1.
Kaitlyn Hair, Malcolm R. Macleod, Emily S. Sena, et al. A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus). Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2019;4:12. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0069-3
1.
Gemma Conroy. Q&A Linda Beaumont: Journals should take action against toxic peer reviews. Nature Index. 2019. https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news-blog/linda-beaumont-research-journals-should-take-action-against-toxic-peer-reviews.
1.
Nyssa J. Silbiger, Amber D. Stubler. Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM. PeerJ. 2019;7:e8247. doi:10.7717/peerj.8247
1.
Talia H. Swartz, Ann-Gel S. Palermo, Sandra K. Masur, Judith A. Aberg. The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019;220(S2):S33-S41. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiz174
1.
Travis A. Hoppe, Aviva Litovitz, Kristine A. Willis, et al. Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. Science Advances. 2019;5(10):aww7238. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw7238
1.
Sandra Bendiscioli. The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision‐making. EMBO reports. 2019;20:e49472. doi:10.15252/embr.201949472