Bias, peer review, and publishing

1.
Helen Le Sueur, Arianna Dagliati, Iain Buchan, et al. Pride and prejudice – What can we learn from peer review? Medical Teacher. 2020;42(9):1012-1018. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1774527
View Full Reference
1.
Oğuzcan Kinikoğlu, Yağmur Ö Güven, Bekir B. Kilboz. Publication and Citation Analysis of Medical Doctors’ Residency Master’s Theses Involving Animal Experiments on Rats in Turkey. Alternatives to laboratory animals: ATLA. 2020;48(1):23-28. doi:10.1177/0261192920907226
View Full Reference
1.
Simon Lohse, Martin S. Wasmer, Thomas A. C. Reydon. Integrating Philosophy of Science into Research on Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in the Life Sciences. Perspectives on Science. 2020;28(6):700-736. doi:10.1162/posc_a_00357
View Full Reference
1.
Anna Severin, Joao Martins, Rachel Heyard, François Delavy, Anne Jorstad, Matthias Egger. Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e035058. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035058
View Full Reference
1.
Danielle B. Rice, Hana Raffoul, John P. A. Ioannidis, David Moher. Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities. BMJ. 2020;369:m2081. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2081
View Full Reference
1.
Alison Mudditt. Reforming Research Assessment: A Tough Nut to Crack. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/02/18/reforming-research-assessment-a-tough-nut-to-crack/. Published 2020.
View Full Reference
1.
A Hatch, R Schmidt. Rethinking Research Assessment: Unintended Cognitive and System Biases.; 2020. https://sfdora.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/DORA_UnintendendedCognitiveSystemBiases.pdf.
View Full Reference
1.
Joel Henrique Ellwanger, José Artur Bogo Chies. We need to talk about peer-review—Experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2020;125:201-205. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.02.001
View Full Reference
1.
Travis G. Gerwing, Alyssa M. Allen Gerwing, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, Chi-Yeung Choi, Jeff C. Clements, Joshua A. Rash. Quantifying professionalism in peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2020;5:9. doi:10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x
View Full Reference
1.
Talia H. Swartz, Ann-Gel S. Palermo, Sandra K. Masur, Judith A. Aberg. The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019;220(S2):S33-S41. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiz174
View Full Reference