1.
Carole Lee. Commensuration Bias in Peer Review. Philosophy of Science. 2022;82(5):1272-1283. doi:10.1086/683652
Bias, peer review, and publishing
1.
Research England, Scottish Funding Council, Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland. Future Research Assessment Programme. https://beta.jisc.ac.uk/future-research-assessment-programme. Published 2022.
1.
Federico Bianchi, Flaminio Squazzoni. Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review. Science and Public Policy. 2022;49(5):791-800. doi:10.1093/scipol/scac027
1.
Ramadurai Petchiappan, Kristy James, Andrew Plume, et al. Analysing Elsevier Journal Metadata With a New Specialized Workbench Inside ICSR Lab. Rochester, NY; 2022. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4211833
1.
Geoff Frampton, Paul Whaley, Micah Bennett, et al. Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews. Environmental Evidence. 2022;11:12. doi:10.1186/s13750-022-00264-0
1.
Holly Else, Jeffrey M. Perkel. The giant plan to track diversity in research journals. Nature. 2022;602:566-570. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00426-7.
1.
Nature. Nature is trialling transparent peer review — the early results are encouraging. Nature. 2022;603:8-8. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00493-w
1.
Nature. Research evaluation needs to change with the times. Nature. 2022;601(7892):166-166. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00056-z
1.
Nathalie D. McKenzie, Raymond Liu, Alden V. Chiu, et al. Exploring Bias in Scientific Peer Review: An ASCO Initiative. JCO Oncology Practice. 2022;18(12):791-799. doi:10.1200/OP.22.00275
1.
James A. Middleton, Stephen Krause, Eugene Judson, et al. A Social Network Analysis of Engineering Faculty Connections: Their Impact on Faculty Student-Centered Attitudes and Practices. Education Sciences. 2022;12(2):108. doi:10.3390/educsci12020108