Bias, peer review, and publishing

Holly Else, Jeffrey M. Perkel. The giant plan to track diversity in research journals. Nature. 2022;602:566-570. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00426-7.

Geoff Frampton, Paul Whaley, Micah Bennett, et al. Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews. Environmental Evidence. 2022;11:12. doi:10.1186/s13750-022-00264-0

Liv Langfeldt. The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome. In: Eva Forsberg, Lars Geschwind, Sara Levander, Wieland Wermke, eds. Peer Review in an Era of Evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham; 2022:297-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75263-7_13.

Jerry Suls, Alexander J. Rothman, Karina W. Davidson. Now Is the Time to Assess the Effects of Open Science Practices with Randomized Control Trials. The American psychologist. 2022;77(3):467-475. doi:10.1037/amp0000871

Paul Whaley, Carlijn R. Hooijmans. PRIVAT Tool. 2022. https://osf.io/bwypt/.

Carole Lee. Commensuration Bias in Peer Review. Philosophy of Science. 2022;82(5):1272-1283. doi:10.1086/683652

Federico Bianchi, Flaminio Squazzoni. Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review. Science and Public Policy. 2022;49(5):791-800. doi:10.1093/scipol/scac027

Nathalie D. McKenzie, Raymond Liu, Alden V. Chiu, et al. Exploring Bias in Scientific Peer Review: An ASCO Initiative. JCO Oncology Practice. 2022;18(12):791-799. doi:10.1200/OP.22.00275

Ramadurai Petchiappan, Kristy James, Andrew Plume, et al. Analysing Elsevier Journal Metadata With a New Specialized Workbench Inside ICSR Lab. Rochester, NY; 2022. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4211833

Latin American Forum for Research Assessment. Evaluating Scientific Research Assessment. https://www.clacso.org/en/evaluating-scientific-research-assessment/. Published 2021.