Bias, peer review, and publishing

Stephen A. Gallo, Michael Pearce, Carole J. Lee, Elena A. Erosheva. A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;8:10. doi:10.1186/s41073-023-00131-7

Karen B. Schmaling, Stephen A. Gallo. Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2023;8:2. doi:10.1186/s41073-023-00127-3

Mytien Nguyen, Sarwat I. Chaudhry, Mayur M. Desai, Kafui Dzirasa, Jose E. Cavazos, Dowin Boatright. Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Inequities in Receipt of Multiple National Institutes of Health Research Project Grants. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6(2):e230855. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0855

Rebecca Abma-Schouten, Joey Gijbels, Wendy Reijmerink, Ingeborg Meijer. Evaluation of research proposals by peer review panels: broader panels for broader assessments?. Science and Public Policy. 2023;50(4):619-632. doi:10.1093/scipol/scad009

Eva Barlösius, Laura Paruschke, Axel Philipps. Peer review’s irremediable flaws: Scientists’ perspectives on grant evaluation in Germany. Research Evaluation. 2023;32(4):623-634. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvad032

Carole Lee. Commensuration Bias in Peer Review. Philosophy of Science. 2022;82(5):1272-1283. doi:10.1086/683652

Research England, Scottish Funding Council, Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland. Future Research Assessment Programme. https://beta.jisc.ac.uk/future-research-assessment-programme. Published 2022.

Liv Langfeldt. The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome. In: Eva Forsberg, Lars Geschwind, Sara Levander, Wieland Wermke, eds. Peer Review in an Era of Evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham; 2022:297-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75263-7_13.

Federico Bianchi, Flaminio Squazzoni. Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review. Science and Public Policy. 2022;49(5):791-800. doi:10.1093/scipol/scac027

Paul Whaley, Carlijn R. Hooijmans. PRIVAT Tool. 2022. https://osf.io/bwypt/.