Bias, peer review, and publishing

Donna K. Ginther, Walter T. Schaffer, Joshua Schnell, et al. Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science. 2011;333(6045):1015-1019. doi:10.1126/science.1196783

Michael R. Donaldson, Kyle C. Hanson, Caleb T. Hasler, Timothy D. Clark, Scott G. Hinch, Steven J. Cooke. Injecting youth into peer-review to increase its sustainability: a case study of ecology journals. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution. 2010;3. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/IEE/article/view/2346.

Sara Schroter, Trish Groves, Liselotte Højgaard. Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations’ and grant reviewers’ perspectives. BMC Medicine. 2010;8:62. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-62

Lawrence D. Berg, Jani Vuolteenaho, eds. Critical Toponymies: The Contested Politics of Place Naming. London: Routledge; 2009:306. https://www.routledge.com/Critical-Toponymies-The-Contested-Politics-of-Place-Naming/Berg-Vuolteenaho/p/book/9781138267756.

Steven A. Greenberg. How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network. BMJ. 2009;339:b2680. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2680

Sonia M. R. Vasconcelos, Martha M. Sorenson, Jacqueline Leta. A new input indicator for the assessment of science & technology research?. Scientometrics. 2009;80:217-230. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2082-z

Trish Reay, C.R. Hinings. Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics. Organization Studies. 2009;30(6):629-652. doi:10.1177/0170840609104803

Erick H. Turner, Annette M. Matthews, Eftihia Linardatos, Robert A. Tell, Robert Rosenthal. Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;358(3):252-260. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa065779

Herbert W. Marsh, Upali W. Jayasinghe, Nigel W. Bond. Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. American Psychologist. 2008;63(3):160-168. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.160

Liv Langfeldt. The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments. Research Evaluation. 2006;15(1):31-41. doi:10.3152/147154406781776039