Bias, peer review, and publishing

1.
David Johann, Jörg Neufeld, Kathrin Thomas, Justus Rathmann, Heiko Rauhut. The impact of researchers’ perceived pressure on their publication strategies. Research Evaluation. 2024:rvae011. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvae011
View Full Reference
1.
Olivia M. Smith, Kayla L. Davis, Robin Waterman, et al. Journals must expand access to peer review data. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2024;39(4):311-314. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2024.02.003
View Full Reference
1.
Mark J. Bolland, Alison Avenell, Andrew Grey. Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better? Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 2024:1-20. doi:10.1080/03036758.2024.2325004
View Full Reference
1.
Tony Ross-Hellauer, Serge P J M Horbach. Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review. Research Evaluation. 2024:rvae004. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvae004
View Full Reference
1.
NIH Center for Scientific Review. CSR Initiatives to Address Bias in Peer Review. https://public.csr.nih.gov/AboutCSR/Address-Bias-in-Peer-Review. Published 2024.
View Full Reference
1.
Nicki Lisa Cole, Eva Kormann, Thomas Klebel, Simon Apartis, Tony Ross-Hellauer. The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 2024;11(6):240286. doi:10.1098/rsos.240286
View Full Reference
1.
Paul Whaley, Robyn B Blain, Derek Draper, et al. Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank. Toxicological Sciences. 2024;201(2):240-253. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfae083
View Full Reference
1.
Marta Moreno-Ibáñez, Mathieu Casado, Gwenaëlle Gremion, et al. Engagement of early career researchers in collaborative assessments of IPCC reports: achievements and insights. Frontiers in Climate. 2024;6. doi:10.3389/fclim.2024.1395040
View Full Reference
1.
Judith C. Madden, Helena Kandarova, Winfried Neuhaus, et al. Journeying Through Journals: The Publishing Process and How to Maximise Research Impact. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 2024;52(6):334-351. doi:10.1177/02611929241286624
View Full Reference
1.
Mike Lauer, Marie A. Bernard. Trends Generally Continue in FY 2023 for Demographic-Specific Funding Rates for Type 1 Research Project Grant and R01-Equivalent Applications –. https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2024/07/29/trends-generally-continue-in-fy-2023-for-demographic-specific-funding-rates-for-type-1-research-project-grant-and-r01-equivalent-applications/. Published 2024.
View Full Reference