Bias, peer review, and publishing

Maryam Sayab, Lisa M. DeTora, Muhammad Sarwar. Publication Pressure vs Research Integrity: Global Insights from an Asian Council of Science Editors Survey. Science Editor. 2025;48(2). doi:10.36591/SE-4803-05

Katarina Zimmer. ‘Lipstick on a pig’: how to fight back against a peer-review bully. Nature. 2025;645(8081):809-812. doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02922-y

Joanie Sims Gould, Anne M. Lasinsky, Adrian Mota, Karim M. Khan, Clare L. Ardern. Threats to grant peer review: a qualitative study. 2025. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091666

Ryan Hill, Yian Yin, Carolyn Stein, Xizhao Wang, Dashun Wang, Benjamin F. Jones. The pivot penalty in research. Nature. 2025;642(8069):999-1006. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09048-1

Finn Luebber, Sören Krach, Frieder M. Paulus, Lena Rademacher, Rima-Maria Rahal. Lottery before peer review is associated with increased female representation and reduced estimated economic cost in a German funding line. Nature Communications. 2025;16(1):9824. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65660-9

Transparent peer review to be extended to all of Nature’s research papers. Nature. 2025;642(8068):542-542. doi:10.1038/d41586-025-01880-9

Yueran Duan, Shahan Ali Memon, Bedoor AlShebli, Qing Guan, Petter Holme, Talal Rahwan. Postdoc publications and citations link to academic retention and faculty success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2025;122(4):e2402053122. doi:10.1073/pnas.2402053122

B. H. Lim, C. D’Ippoliti, M. Dominik, et al. Regional and institutional trends in assessment for academic promotion. Nature. 2025:1-10. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08422-9

Pierre Azoulay, Wesley H. Greenblatt. Does Peer Review Penalize Scientific Risk Taking? Evidence from NIH Grant Renewals.; 2025. doi:10.3386/w33495

Olivia M. Smith, Kayla L. Davis, Robin Waterman, et al. Journals must expand access to peer review data. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2024;39(4):311-314. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2024.02.003