Skip to main content
Menu
Search
Search
Main navigation
Home
Author Guide
Author Guide sub-navigation
Experimental Resources
Preregistration
Manuscript Preparation
Journal Database
Suggesting Reviewers
Responding to Biased Reviews
Reference Library
Projects
Projects sub-navigation
Gathering Evidence
Editor Outreach
Funder Advocacy
What Researchers Can Do
Resources
Resources sub-navigation
Publications & Media
Webinar Recordings
Experimental Resources
Reference Library
Events
About
Search
Search
Breadcrumb
Home
Author Guide for Addressing Animal Methods Bias in Publishing
Reference Library
This comprehensive bibliography of references may be useful for authors during any stage of research, from study design to manuscript preparation to responding to reviewers.
Library Collection(s)
- Any -
Animal Methods Bias database
-Bias, peer review, and publishing
-Ethics, policy, and legislation
-Nonanimal model literature
--Aging
--Bioengineering and model development
--Bone
--Cancer
--Cardiovascular system
--Dental and oral
--Developmental biology
--Endocrine system
--Gastrointestinal system
--Genetics
--Immune/infectious disease
--In Silico
--Liver
--Media and materials
--Multi-organ systems
--Musculoskeletal
--Nervous system
--Population and variability
--Precision medicine
--Renal/urinary system
--Reproductive
--Respiratory system
--Reviews and perspectives
--Skin
--Toxicology
--Vision
-Standards, reporting, and preregistration
-Training and education
-Translation and validation
COLAAB Media Coverage
COLAAB Publications
Keywords
Title
Author
Year
Proceedings of a workshop to address animal methods bias in scientific publishing
Catharine E. Krebs
2023
Professional quality of life in animal research personnel is linked to retention & job satisfaction: A mixed-methods cross-sectional survey on compassion fatigue in the USA
Lauren Young
0
Progenitor identification and SARS-CoV-2 infection in human distal lung organoids
Ameen A. Salahudeen
2020
Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin
Sheila MacNeil
2007
Progress in developing microphysiological systems for biological product assessment
Mona Mansouri
2024
Progress toward ‘bone-on-a-chip’
Robert Phillips
2023
Promoting Reusable and Open Methods and Protocols (PRO-MaP)
LEITE Sofia Batista
2024
Promoting Reusable and Open Methods and Protocols (PRO-MaP): Draft recommendations to improve methodological clarity in life sciences publications
Sofia Batista Leite
2024
Proprioceptors-enriched neuronal cultures from induced pluripotent stem cells from Friedreich ataxia patients show altered transcriptomic and proteomic profiles, abnormal neurite extension, and impaired electrophysiological properties
Chiara Dionisi
2023
Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda
Cory J. Clark
2023
Protocol for designing INVITES-IN, a tool for assessing the internal validity of in vitro studies
Camilla Svendsen
2023
Protocol for the fabrication of self-standing (nano)cellulose-based 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering
Tamilselvan Mohan
2025
Protocol for the use of Oredsson universal replacement medium for cell banking and routine culturing of monolayer and suspension cultures
Stina Oredsson
2025
Public attitudes to animal research in 2018
Ipsos MORI
2018
Public consultation in the evaluation of animal research protocols
Michael W. Brunt
0
Public funds being swallowed up by scientific journals with dubious articles
Manuel Ansede
2023
Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare
2015
Publication bias
Nicholas J. DeVito
2019
Publication bias and meta-analysis
Mary Lee Smith
1980
Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy
Emily S. Sena
0
Publication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away
Kay Dickersin
1993
Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better?
Mark J. Bolland
2024
Publication rate in preclinical research: a plea for preregistration
Mira van der Naald
2020
Publish or perish: Where are we heading?
Seema Rawat
2014
Publishing negative results is good for science
Elisabeth M. Bik
2024
Pagination
Previous page
34
Next page
RSS feed