Publishing

David Moher, Anna Catharina Vieira Armond. Publisher and journal reciprocity for peer review: Not so much. Accountability in Research. 2025;32(5):832-837. doi:10.1080/08989621.2025.2450451

Katarina Zimmer. ‘Lipstick on a pig’: how to fight back against a peer-review bully. Nature. 2025;645(8081):809-812. doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02922-y

Transparent peer review to be extended to all of Nature’s research papers. Nature. 2025;642(8068):542-542. doi:10.1038/d41586-025-01880-9

Aurore Receveur, Jonathan Bonfanti, Stephanie D’Agata, et al. David versus Goliath: Early career researchers in an unethical publishing system. Ecology Letters. 2024;27(3):e14395. doi:10.1111/ele.14395

Catharine E. Krebs, Celean Camp, Helder Constantino, et al. Author Guide for Addressing Animal Methods Bias in Publishing. Advanced Science. 2023;10(30):2303226. doi:10.1002/advs.202303226

Jessie V. Willis, Kelly D. Cobey, Janina Ramos, et al. Limited online training opportunities exist for scholarly peer reviewers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2023;161:65-73. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.023

Catharine E. Krebs, Celean Camp, Helder Constantino, et al. Proceedings of a workshop to address animal methods bias in scientific publishing. Alternatives to Animal Experimentation. 2023;40(4):677-688. doi:10.14573/altex.2210211

Richard Van Noorden. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record. Nature. 2023;624:479-481. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8.

Holly Else, Jeffrey M. Perkel. The giant plan to track diversity in research journals. Nature. 2022;602:566-570. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00426-7.

Nature. Nature is trialling transparent peer review — the early results are encouraging. Nature. 2022;603:8-8. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00493-w