1.
David Moher, Anna Catharina Vieira Armond. Publisher and journal reciprocity for peer review: Not so much. Accountability in Research. 2025;32(5):832-837. doi:10.1080/08989621.2025.2450451
Periodicals as Topic
1.
Mario Gaudino, N. Bryce Robinson, Antonino Di Franco, et al. Effects of Experimental Interventions to Improve the Biomedical Peer-Review Process: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021;10(15):e019903. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.019903
1.
Cathalijn H. C. Leenaars, Carien Kouwenaar, Frans R. Stafleu, et al. Animal to human translation: a systematic scoping review of reported concordance rates. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2019;17(1):223. doi:10.1186/s12967-019-1976-2
1.
Samir Haffar, Fateh Bazerbachi, M. Hassan Murad. Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2019;94(4):670-676. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.004
1.
Anthony Chauvin, Philippe Ravaud, Gabriel Baron, Caroline Barnes, Isabelle Boutron. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors. BMC medicine. 2015;13:158. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0395-3
1.
S. N. Goodman, J. Berlin, S. W. Fletcher, R. H. Fletcher. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994;121(1):11-21. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-121-1-199407010-00003