editorial policies

1.
Mario Gaudino, N. Bryce Robinson, Antonino Di Franco, et al. Effects of Experimental Interventions to Improve the Biomedical Peer-Review Process: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021;10(15):e019903. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.019903
View Full Reference
1.
Anthony Chauvin, Philippe Ravaud, Gabriel Baron, Caroline Barnes, Isabelle Boutron. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors. BMC medicine. 2015;13:158. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0395-3
View Full Reference
1.
Michael R. Donaldson, Kyle C. Hanson, Caleb T. Hasler, Timothy D. Clark, Scott G. Hinch, Steven J. Cooke. Injecting youth into peer-review to increase its sustainability: a case study of ecology journals. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution. 2010;3. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/IEE/article/view/2346.
View Full Reference