Bias, peer review, and publishing

1.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. Minimizing Unconscious Bias in Peer Revew. https://www.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/Minimizing-Unconscous-Bias.pdf.
View Full Reference
1.
Tania Henriquez. Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher. mBio. 14(5):e01948-23. doi:10.1128/mbio.01948-23
View Full Reference
1.
What Is a Good Impact Factor for an Academic Journal? https://akjournals.com/page/222.
View Full Reference
1.
Item - Applicants as Reviewers: Evaluating the Risks, Benefits, and Potential of Distributed Peer Review for Grant Funding Allocations  (RoRI Working Paper No. 17) - Research on Research Institute - Figshare. https://rori.figshare.com/articles/preprint/_b_Applicants_as_Reviewers_Evaluating_the_Risks_Benefits_and_Potential_of_Distributed_Peer_Review_for_Grant_Funding_Allocations_b_b_b_RoRI_Working_Paper_No_17_/29994841/3?file=61607221.
View Full Reference
1.
How to Become a Great Peer Reviewer: Pro Tips & Ready-to-Use Templates for Researchers. https://www.peeref.com/e-collections/how-to-become-a-great-peer-reviewer-pro-tips-ready-to-use-templates-for-researchers.
View Full Reference
1.
Kathryn Palmer. Will Paying Reviewers Ease the Peer Review Crisis? https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty/books-publishing/2026/05/14/will-paying-reviewers-ease-peer-review-crisis.
View Full Reference
1.
Fetal Membrane Organ-On-Chip: An Innovative Approach to Study Cellular Interactions | Reproductive Sciences | Springer Nature Link. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43032-020-00184-9.
View Full Reference