Bias, peer review, and publishing

Michele Avissar-Whiting, Frédérique Belliard, Stefano M. Bertozzi, et al. Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science. PLOS Biology. 22(2):e3002502. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002502

Tony Ross-Hellauer, Arvid Deppe, Birgit Schmidt. Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers. PLOS ONE. 12(12):e0189311. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189311

Ellen Driessen, Steven D. Hollon, Claudi L. H. Bockting, Pim Cuijpers, Erick H. Turner. Does Publication Bias Inflate the Apparent Efficacy of Psychological Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of US National Institutes of Health-Funded Trials. PLOS ONE. 10(9):e0137864. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137864

Kerry Dwan, Carrol Gamble, Paula R. Williamson, Jamie J. Kirkham. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review. PLOS ONE. 8(7):e66844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066844

John P. A. Ioannidis. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLOS Medicine. 2(8):e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Malcolm R. Macleod, Aaron Lawson McLean, Aikaterini Kyriakopoulou, et al. Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement. PLOS Biology. 13(10):e1002273. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273

Michael W. Brunt, Daniel M. Weary. Public consultation in the evaluation of animal research protocols. PLOS ONE. 16(12):e0260114. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260114

NIH Center for Scientific Review. Reviewer Surveys — Feedback on CSRs’ Bias Awareness and Mitigation Training. https://public.csr.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2022-04/Reviewer_Bias_Training_Survey_Report_2022-01_Council_Round_final.pdf.

David Moher, Lex Bouter, Sabine Kleinert, et al. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology. 18(7):e3000737. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737

Anne Gärtner, Daniel Leising, Felix D. Schönbrodt. Towards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality. PLOS Biology. 22(2):e3002553. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002553