Jue Wang, Philip Shapira. Is There a Relationship between Research Sponsorship and Publication Impact? An Analysis of Funding Acknowledgments in Nanotechnology Papers. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0117727. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117727
Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke, Ismael Rafols. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. 2015;520(7548):429-431. doi:10.1038/520429a
Qi Wang, Ulf Sandström. Defining the role of cognitive distance in the peer review process with an explorative study of a grant scheme in infection biology. Research Evaluation. 2015;24(3):271-281. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv009
James Galipeau, David Moher, Craig Campbell, et al. A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2015;68(3):257-265. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.024
Anthony Chauvin, Philippe Ravaud, Gabriel Baron, Caroline Barnes, Isabelle Boutron. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors. BMC medicine. 2015;13:158. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0395-3
Seema Rawat, Sanjay Meena. Publish or perish: Where are we heading? Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2014;19(2):87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999612/.
Valentina Tartari, Markus Perkmann, Ammon Salter. In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists. Research Policy. 2014;43(7):1189-1203. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.003
Adrian Mulligan, Louise Hall, Ellen Raphael. Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013;64(1):132-161. doi:10.1002/asi.22798