Standards, reporting, and preregistration

Anna J. van der Zalm, João Barroso, Patience Browne, et al. A framework for establishing scientific confidence in new approach methodologies. Archives of Toxicology. 2022;96:2865-2879. doi:10.1007/s00204-022-03365-4

Boya Xie, Zhihong Shen, Kuansan Wang. Is Preprint the Future of Science? A Thirty Year Journey of Online Preprint Services.; 2021. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2102.09066

Natalie Parletta. How to respond to difficult or negative peer-reviewer feedback. Nature Index. 2021. https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news-blog/how-to-respond-difficult-negative-peer-reviewer-feedback.

Monica Piergiovanni, Ozlem Cangar, Sofia B. Leite, et al. Putting Science into Standards workshop on standards for organ-on-chip. Stem Cell Reports. 2021;16(9):2076-2077. doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.07.010

Julia M. L. Menon, Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga, Pandora Pound, Erica van Oort. The impact of conducting preclinical systematic reviews on researchers and their research: A mixed method case study. PloS One. 2021;16(12):e0260619. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260619

Annette Flanagin, Tracy Frey, Stacy L. Christiansen, AMA Manual of Style Committee. Updated Guidance on the Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals. JAMA. 2021;326(7):621-627. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.13304

Mira van der Naald, Steven Wenker, Pieter A. Doevendans, Kimberley E. Wever, Steven A. J. Chamuleau. Publication rate in preclinical research: a plea for preregistration. BMJ Open Science. 2020;4(1):e100051. doi:10.1136/bmjos-2019-100051

Thomas Hartung, Rob De Vries, Sebastian Hoffmann, et al. Toward Good In Vitro Reporting Standards. Alternatives to Animal Experimentation. 2019;36(1):3-17. doi:10.14573/altex.1812191

Devang Mehta. Highlight negative results to improve science. Nature. 2019. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02960-3.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Guidance Document on Good In Vitro Method Practices (GIVIMP).; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304796-en.