Standards, reporting, and preregistration

Kristifor Sunderic. Chapter 17 - Building confidence in new approach methodologies through reporting, validation, and benchmarking. In: Catharine E. Krebs, Gail A. Van Norman, eds. Moving Toward Nonanimal Approaches in Medical Research and Testing. Academic Press; 2027:277-288. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780443265143000011.

Miriam N. Jacobs, Heli M. Hollnagel, Karma Fussel, et al. Confidence in new approach methods (NAMs): Ensuring reproducibility, operationalising context-of-use and alignment with decision-making needs. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2026;166:106016. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.106016

Céline Heinl, Nuno H. Franco, Bettina Bert, et al. A call for preregistration of in vitro research. EMBO Reports. 2026. doi:10.1038/s44319-026-00764-x

Jonathan Blum, Markus Brüll, Jan G. Hengstler, et al. The long way from raw data to NAM-based information: Overview on data layers and processing steps. ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation. 2025;42(1):167-180. doi:10.14573/altex.2412171

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Guidance Document on Good In Vitro Method Practices (GIVIMP), Second Edition.; 2025. https://doi.org/10.1787/5ba6777b-en.

Ronit Mohapatra, Marcel Leist, Sonja von Aulock, Thomas Hartung. Guidance for Good In Vitro Reporting Standards (GIVReSt) – A draft for stakeholder discussion and background documentation. ALTEX - Alternatives to Animal Experimentation. 2025;42(3):376-396. doi:10.14573/altex.2507041

Houmam Araj, Leroy Worth, David T. Yeung. Elements of successful NIH grant applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2024;121(15):e2315735121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2315735121

Daniël Lakens, Cristian Mesquida, Sajedeh Rasti, Massimiliano Ditroilo. The benefits of preregistration and Registered Reports. Evidence-Based Toxicology. 2024;2(1):2376046. doi:10.1080/2833373X.2024.2376046

Marcel LaFlamme. Improving Methods Reporting in the Life Sciences. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2024/07/24/guest-post-improving-methods-reporting-in-the-life-sciences/. Published 2024.

Elisabeth M. Bik. Publishing negative results is good for science. Access Microbiology. 2024;6(4):000792. doi:10.1099/acmi.0.000792