@article{bibcite_4396,
  keywords = {Scientific Communication},
  author = {Douglas P. Peters and Stephen J. Ceci},
  title = {Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again},
  abstract = {12 research articles were resubmitted to the journals that had published them 18{\textendash}32 mo previously, with ficticious names and institutions substituted for the original ones. Only 3 of the resubmissions were detected, and 8 of the remaining articles were rejected{\textemdash}primarily for "serious methodological flaws." Author{\textendash}reviewer accountability is discussed, and recommendations for improving the peer review system are presented. Commentary on this article is provided by 56 authors along with the original authors{\textquoteright} response. (3 p ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)},
  year = {1982},
  journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
  volume = {5},
  pages = {187-195},
  month = {1982},
  issn = {1469-1825},
  doi = {10.1017/S0140525X00011183},
}